kermit.columbia.edu/kermit.columbia.edu.tar/kermit.columbia.edu/newsgroups/misc.19941221-19950208/[e-mail]_Wed Dec 28 22:17:03 1994.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-07-31 | 2KB

Received: from apakabar.cc.columbia.edu by watsun.cc.columbia.edu with SMTP id AA27430
  (5.65c+CU/IDA-1.4.4/HLK for <[e-mail]>); Wed, 28 Dec 1994 17:18:34 -0500
Received: by apakabar.cc.columbia.edu id AA06943
  (5.65c+CU/IDA-1.4.4/HLK for kermit.misc@watsun); Wed, 28 Dec 1994 17:18:32 -0500
Path: news.columbia.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!pipex!uunet!svc.portal.com!shell.portal.com!news1.shell.portal.com!kshaw
From: [e-mail] (kendall thomason shaw)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Increasing file transfer through put
Date: 28 Dec 1994 22:17:03 GMT
Organization: Incredible Employees Assoc.
Lines: 20
Distribution: world
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Nntp-Posting-Host: jobe.shell.portal.com
Apparently-To: [e-mail]


Hi,
    Transfering uncompressed text I get about 2800cps over my 14.4
modem.  Transferring zipped files I get about 1200cps. This seems to be
roughly the same for window sizes above 1000. At one point I thought
that there was some optimum window size and number. Now I'm not
sure. Why wouldn't 31 windows of 9024 bytes each be way over kill but
optimum in all cases? Is there a formula or a procedure for
determining this other than trial and error? Also is there a way to
take better advantage of V42 in my modem. Better in the sense of
increasing throughput of correct data. I'm basicly content but just
thought I'd ask. My computer is a 486-33 and I dial into a rather
speedy Sun4m architecture machine.

thanks
--

Kendall Shaw                        "!"
[phone]                         -- me
[e-mail]